Hi Steve,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 16:12 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> The libssl transition should not be a priority, but this is not the same
> thing as it being "called off". You should still upload to fix RC bugs as
> usual, and not worry about whether this means libssl0.9.7 or libssl0.9
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:06:40PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> > patch or if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,
Hi
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
>
>>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
>>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
>>patch
Hi Luk,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Note that this also r
Hi Luk,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Note that this also r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Note that this also resolves the build error and
6 matches
Mail list logo
