On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Igor Genibel told:
> * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-04 18:51:40
> +0200]:
>
> [...]
> > > It currently use mutt-ng with gpgme support, I hope I'll not
> > > repacage it anymore :)
> >
> > The compile runs less than 2 minutes ;-)
>
>
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-04 18:51:40 +0200]:
[...]
> > It currently use mutt-ng with gpgme support, I hope I'll not repacage it
> > anymore :)
>
> The compile runs less than 2 minutes ;-)
Ok, it is a deaf dialog. No need to continue. Feel free to close, let open,
forward
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Igor Genibel told:
> * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-03 12:11:47 +0200]:
>
> > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
> > Igor Genibel told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Yes of course. But gpgme give the hability to use gpg agent which is
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-03 12:11:47 +0200]:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
> Igor Genibel told:
>
> [...]
> > Yes of course. But gpgme give the hability to use gpg agent which is really
> > useful: no need to type the passphrase for each signed mail, packa
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Igor Genibel told:
[...]
> Yes of course. But gpgme give the hability to use gpg agent which is really
> useful: no need to type the passphrase for each signed mail, package signing,
Passphrase timeout is controlled via $pgp_timeout.
> ...
> You need t
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-02 22:48:07 +0200]:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
> Igor Genibel told:
>
> > * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-02 19:41:49 +0200]:
> >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > please provide a version that is compiled against
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Igor Genibel told:
> * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-02 19:41:49 +0200]:
>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > please provide a version that is compiled against gpgme
> >
> > Why?
>
> because it is useful.
Hmmm, /usr/share/doc/mutt-ng/samples/g
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-02 19:41:49 +0200]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please provide a version that is compiled against gpgme
>
> Why?
because it is useful.
--
Igor Genibel
«Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro»
Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world.
Dubrovnik
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Igor Genibel told:
> Package: mutt-ng
> Version: 0.0+20050916-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> please provide a version that is compiled against gpgme
Why?
Elimar
--
Numeric stability is probably not all that
important when you're guessing;
Package: mutt-ng
Version: 0.0+20050916-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
please provide a version that is compiled against gpgme
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh li
10 matches
Mail list logo
