On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:08:43AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Hey, it's been 3 months, what's your status on this?
Oh, man. Time flies, eh? :(
Last status was this:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/2016-June/006723.html
and it's still current.
I want to say
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:50:19PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 09:21:56PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 serious
> > Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Thanks for the update and patch. I'm dropping Russ from CC because he is no
> longer actively involved in m
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 09:21:56PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + patch
Thanks for the update and patch. I'm dropping Russ from CC because he is
no longer actively involved in maintaining openldap. I will try to get
this uploaded ASAP.
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:47:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I see that we're indeed still shipping /etc/ldap/ldap.conf in the library
> package. This is a Policy violation (8.2); we really should do something
> about it.
I confirm that th
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm concerned that not shipping the default config file in a package
> somewhere would make this less discoverable for users; and while I don't
> think we want to ship a completely separate binary package just for the
> ldap.conf(5) manpage, if we don't
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:47:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you write the file in postinst (then probably using ucf) you would
> > have to remove the file in postrm on purge. But if lidldap2 and libldap3
> > are installed and libldap2 is
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you write the file in postinst (then probably using ucf) you would
> have to remove the file in postrm on purge. But if lidldap2 and libldap3
> are installed and libldap2 is purged the conffile must remain. Same
> under multiarch if libldap2:i3
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:39:23AM +, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> A clean way to handle this would be a ldap2-common package that handles the
>> conffile.
>
> I don't like having a package for just a single config file.
Hi Goswin,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:39:23AM +, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> A clean way to handle this would be a ldap2-common package that handles the
> conffile.
I don't like having a package for just a single config file. If
multiarch is the way we are going I'll surely support it a
Package: libldap2
Version: 2.1.30-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
when trying to use libldap2 under biarch/multiarch I get the following error:
Unpacking libldap2 (from .../libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/data/deb-amd64/debian/pool/main/o/openldap2/libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
(--
10 matches
Mail list logo
