> Doing this had the effect that logging in on a tty gave me the correct
> environment variables; however, logging in under X (using GDM) results
> in the behaviour described in the original report.
This becomes a problem in gdm. It uses its own PAM config file so the
gdm maintainer needs to do
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:06:05AM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> > Sorry I did not specify that this version was uploaded today, and will
> > probably be available only tomorrow.
> It is available today.
I grabbed it (though the packages pages hadn't updated wit
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:06:05AM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Christian Perrier writes:
> > > Quoting Nicolas Fran?ois ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > >
> > > > Can you check with libpam_modules 0.79-2?
> > The packages s
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Christian Perrier writes:
> > Quoting Nicolas Fran�ois ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > >
> > > Can you check with libpam_modules 0.79-2?
>
> The packages search page for libpam-modules doesn't list 0.79-2 under
> any of the dis
Christian Perrier writes:
> Quoting Nicolas Fran?ois ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Can you check with libpam_modules 0.79-2?
The packages search page for libpam-modules doesn't list 0.79-2 under
any of the distributions; where would I find this?
> You can also add "readenv=1" to the pam_env l
Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> Can you check with libpam_modules 0.79-2?
You can also add "readenv=1" to the pam_env line in
/etc/pam.d/login...
6 matches
Mail list logo
