Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Szabo
I have not yet found any uses for utmp/wtmp: maybe Joey is right and there is no security issue. I would then suggest that to increase security, setuid/setgid bits be removed from all utmp/wmtp maintainers. In the meantime, I hope that conscientious sysadmins do look at who and last output occasio

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > > severity 329156 normal > > thanks dude > > You didn't Cc: control, I've bounced it to control. I usually use Bcc for that, so that group replies don't annoy our control dude. :) > > Ok, so unless somebody prov

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > severity 329156 normal > thanks dude You didn't Cc: control, I've bounced it to control. > Ok, so unless somebody proves us wrong we don't consider this a > security problem. Is something to be done for the allocated CVE id? Cheers

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-07 Thread Martin Schulze
severity 329156 normal thanks dude Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Could somebody explain the security implication for me? > > You can record in the utmp/wtmp logs something which is wrong, for > example that an user is currently connected t

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-07 Thread Paul Szabo
Joey, > Could somebody explain the security implication for me? > > being able to write arbitrary strings into valid records without > overwriting any other data in utmp/wtmp can hardly be classified > as a security vulnerability. It depends on what trust you place in the correctness of utmp/wtmp

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > Could somebody explain the security implication for me? You can record in the utmp/wtmp logs something which is wrong, for example that an user is currently connected to a display while he isn't. I'm not the one to argue with though.

Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo

2005-10-06 Thread Martin Schulze
Could somebody explain the security implication for me? being able to write arbitrary strings into valid records without overwriting any other data in utmp/wtmp can hardly be classified as a security vulnerability. (Apart from that, I'm only slightly annoyed as I had to learn about this via MITRE