Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, now that we're build-depending on UnixODBC instead of iODBC, it
> might also cause problems for back_sql. If you think this is the right
> solution otherwise, we could revert back to iodbc for the time being.
> (I seem to have a bug to shake out t
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:02:27PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > That still leaves back-perl. Maybe we can convince Brendan to start
> > linking all modules (and the Perl interpretor) against libperl as of the
> > 5.10 release that's coming soon?
> I honestly don't know if it makes sense or not
This one time, at band camp, Russ Allbery said:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wonder if it would be worthwhile to live with the code duplication and
> > namespace pollution and use libltdl in convenience mode instead of
> > installable mode with slapd. That would basically ca
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if it would be worthwhile to live with the code duplication and
> namespace pollution and use libltdl in convenience mode instead of
> installable mode with slapd. That would basically cause slapd to use
> RTLD_GLOBAL, correct? It would resolve
4 matches
Mail list logo
