Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:
[...]
>> Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?
>
> Is this an irony? Anyway; if the required taglib is not in Debian, I
> can't obviously use it. Unless it is determin
* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:12:42 +0200]:
> > + do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).
> > FYI, debian/patches/taglib-1.3.1-suffices.diff in the source package.
> Of course upstream is stupid to make a depends on taglib 1.4 ?
Is this an irony
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
> close 326611
This close command is deprecated and should not be used.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
[...]
> + do not require TagLib 1.4.0 since it's not in Debian yet (#323280).
>
> FYI, debian/patches/ta
notfound 326611 1.3.0-1
close 326611
thanks
* Christian Marillat [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:38:31 +0200]:
> Package: amarok
> Version: 1.3.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
The amarok 1.3.0-1 package does _not_ FTBFS, see below. I'm hence
closing this bug.
> I really want to know how
Package: amarok
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
I really want to know how you are doing this package when I try to compile
amarok I see :
=== amaroK - ERROR ==
==
5 matches
Mail list logo