On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 06:40:20PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:48:59AM +0200, Lo?c Minier wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005, Christoph Siess wrote:
> > > that would be great. What do you thing about taking the maintainership
> > > of this packags? I'm currently very
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:48:59AM +0200, Lo?c Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005, Christoph Siess wrote:
> > that would be great. What do you thing about taking the maintainership
> > of this packags? I'm currently very busy and have not mutch time to
> > maintain wmfire.
>
> I'm afraid I
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005, Christoph Siess wrote:
> that would be great. What do you thing about taking the maintainership
> of this packags? I'm currently very busy and have not mutch time to
> maintain wmfire.
I'm afraid I'm not interested as I don't use the package. However I
can set
Hi,
that would be great. What do you thing about taking the maintainership
of this packags? I'm currently very busy and have not mutch time to
maintain wmfire.
regards,
Christoph
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:21:02AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Package: wmfire
> Version: 1.2.1-4.1
> Severity: import
Package: wmfire
Version: 1.2.1-4.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
I intend to NMU wmfire with the attached diff. This is especially
urgen because it blocks the ongoing transitions (GNOME 2.10 at least).
If you don't object to the changes, I'll upload in 2 days.
Bye,
-- Syst
5 matches
Mail list logo