Hi Steve,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:03:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, the SHLIBEXT problem is fixed in unixodbc 2.2.11, the version
> currently in unstable. Could you get me a backtrace of one of these
> apache2 segfaults? I'd like to also see whether that bug still exists
> in unst
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:56:27PM -0500, David D. Kilzer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:40:09PM -0500, David D. Kilzer wrote:
> > When the unixodbc package is built, the SHLIBEXT C pre-processor macro
> > is not defined. (I believe this is because the libltdl library is
> > intent
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:40:09PM -0500, David D. Kilzer wrote:
> When the unixodbc package is built, the SHLIBEXT C pre-processor macro
> is not defined. (I believe this is because the libltdl library is
> intentionally not built by the Debian package, although I haven't tested
> this hypothesi
Package: unixodbc
Version: 2.2.4-11
Severity: important
Tags: patch
When the unixodbc package is built, the SHLIBEXT C pre-processor macro
is not defined. (I believe this is because the libltdl library is
intentionally not built by the Debian package, although I haven't tested
this hypothesis.)
4 matches
Mail list logo