On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:41, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Is that issue at least documented in Etch release notes? i.e. is the
> current filesystem hierarchy described? If not, closing this bug
> really solves nothing.
No. But I don't think it needs to be. Release notes are not a
documentatio
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:41:08PM +0300, =?UTF-8?Q? Martin-=C3=89ric?= Racine
wrote:
> >Sorry that we never got around to documenting this issue. As Sarge is
> >about to be replaced with Etch, I'm closing this request.
>
> Is that issue at least documented in Etch release notes? i.e. is the
> cu
On 4/4/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#323834: release-notes: changes in filesystem hierarchy since Woody not
explained,
which was filed against the release-notes package.
It has been closed by Frans Pop <[EM
Package: release-notes
Version: 3.1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wanted to upgrade the filesystem hierarchy on my recently dist-upgraded Woody
boxes to match what the default would
be on a clean Sarge install (e.g. cdrom and floppy in /media instead of on
th
4 matches
Mail list logo
