Bug#323828: soon VAC and upload timing

2005-08-24 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I know you will kill me, but is it possible a bit earlier: Since I'm not so good in telekilling, I reverted to testing and uploading... > What do you think? I have tested tex-common (as it is atm in svn) with > the new texlive-packages. When

Bug#323828: soon VAC and upload timing (was: Bug#323828: tetex-bin: updmap fails while installation)

2005-08-24 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mit, 24 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > This is ok for you: > > Looks good. Submitted together with changelog entries. > > And if yes, what is your timeline for uploading a new version to > > unstable (new version of tex-common)? > > Doing the test runs for tex-common is quite fast, since

Bug#323828: soon VAC and upload timing (was: Bug#323828: tetex-bin: updmap fails while installation)

2005-08-24 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote: >> We should probably rename fmtutil.cnf and updmap.cfg, too, if they are > > This is ok for you: Looks good. > And if yes, what is your timeline for uploading a new version to > unstable (new version of tex-c