On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:26:14 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> If I manage to review the license completely, I will send my analysis
> to debian-legal only, because I don't think the BTS is the right place
> for license analysis and discussion.
> When a conclusion is reached a link to the list archive
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:38:37 +0100 James Westby wrote:
>
> Hi, there is an open ITP on metasploit-framework (#323420), and the
> owner Luciano asked me to contact this list about some of the license
> issues involved with the package.
Hi, this is indeed the right list to contact.
>
> At the mo
* James Westby:
> ;This file is part of the Metasploit Exploit Framework
> ;and is subject to the same licenses and copyrights as
> ;the rest of this package.
This should be fine; a lot of Perl modules use similar language.
> There is a zlib implementation with the follow
Hi, there is an open ITP on metasploit-framework (#323420), and the
owner Luciano asked me to contact this list about some of the license
issues involved with the package.
At the moment the framework is at version 2, and is released under a
dual license of GPL v2 and Perl Artistic.
There are a
4 matches
Mail list logo
