On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:40:58AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> At Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:42:52 -0700,
> Matt Kraai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > This bug is pretty difficult to fix, since we don't really have a
> > > canonical list of packages that must be installed, and must not.
> > >
> > > Do you have
At Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:42:52 -0700,
Matt Kraai wrote:
Hi,
> > This bug is pretty difficult to fix, since we don't really have a
> > canonical list of packages that must be installed, and must not.
> >
> > Do you have a specific approach to this problem in mind?
>
> We could remove the packages t
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:19:58AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > > For example, slang1a-utf8 was superseded by libslang2 but pbuilder
> > > > update does not remove it.
> > >
> > > I would recommend running pbuilder create; but in
> > > practice it is not possible to create pbuilder
Hi,
> > > For example, slang1a-utf8 was superseded by libslang2 but pbuilder
> > > update does not remove it.
> >
> > I would recommend running pbuilder create; but in
> > practice it is not possible to create pbuilder chroot for
> > sid; which is a bit of a problem.
>
> This is what I'm doing,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:23:39AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Package: pbuilder
> > Version: 0.128
> >
> > pbuilder update does not remove packages that are unavailable.
>
> Yup.
>
> > For example, slang1a-utf8 was superseded by libslang2 but pbuilder
> > update does not remove it
Hi,
> Package: pbuilder
> Version: 0.128
>
> pbuilder update does not remove packages that are unavailable.
Yup.
> For example, slang1a-utf8 was superseded by libslang2 but pbuilder
> update does not remove it.
I would recommend running pbuilder create; but in
practice it is not possible to c
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.128
pbuilder update does not remove packages that are unavailable.
For example, slang1a-utf8 was superseded by libslang2 but pbuilder
update does not remove it.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7 matches
Mail list logo
