At Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:05:38 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> > I changed now. BTW, is it ok to leave dependency "Depends:
> > libnss-dns-udeb"?
>
> Good point, we do currently include libc on at least one image (boot
> floppy) without libnss-dns, so it's not really a dependency and the
> dependency sho
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I changed now. BTW, is it ok to leave dependency "Depends:
> libnss-dns-udeb"?
Good point, we do currently include libc on at least one image (boot
floppy) without libnss-dns, so it's not really a dependency and the
dependency should be removed.
--
see shy jo
signature.
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:51:18 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> libc6-udeb depends on libnss-files-udeb, which is unnecessary since most
> d-i images don't need that udeb at all, and the udebs that do need it
> seems to depend on it (openssh-client-udeb, openssh-server-udeb).
I changed now. BTW, is it ok
Package: glibc
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
libc6-udeb depends on libnss-files-udeb, which is unnecessary since most
d-i images don't need that udeb at all, and the udebs that do need it
seems to depend on it (openssh-client-udeb, openssh-server-udeb).
d-i has ignored unfilled dependencies when bui
4 matches
Mail list logo
