On 2005/08/13 00:42, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I wasn't really aware that there _were_ that many ways to use
> libapreq2. If there are useful ones which for some reason aren't
> supported by my packaging, I'd be happy to hear about them.
libapreq can be used for req
[Please Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there's something you feel should also
go into the bug log]
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:28:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> hm, libapreq2 can be used in many different ways... dependencies are
> important, but forcing everyone to install all dependencies (Apache2
(Overquoting a bit since your previous message didn't hit the BTS)
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>> Yes, due to #319614, which says exactly the opposite of your bug report. :-)
> b.d.o was down when I submitted the report, but I guessed that. This
> bug report is
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> In the revision 6, a dependency on libapache2-mod-apreq2 was added.
Yes, due to #319614, which says exactly the opposite of your bug report. :-)
> Since it is perfectly possible to use libapache2-request-perl without
> libapache2-m
Package: libapache2-request-perl
Version: 2.05-dev-6
In the revision 6, a dependency on libapache2-mod-apreq2 was added.
Since it is perfectly possible to use libapache2-request-perl without
libapache2-mod-apreq2 (e.g. in CGI scripts), this dependency should be
downgraded to "Recommends" or even b
5 matches
Mail list logo
