Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The kernel patch itself might actually be workable enough
for unstable but I'm afraid the userspace is pretty much missing still
and some things have been moved to userspace that are reasonably
important (such as load balanc
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:53:17AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Can you please comment on the below?
>
> The OpenMosix packages were intentionally kept out of sarge because
> upstream's not terribly interested in the 2.4 patches and they're
>
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can you please comment on the below?
The OpenMosix packages were intentionally kept out of sarge because
upstream's not terribly interested in the 2.4 patches and they're
working on a 2.6 version. The 2.6 version is expected to be somewhat
bett
retitle 319817 RM: openmosix -- RoQA; Outdated and buggy
tags 319817 moreinfo
thanks
Stephen,
Can you please comment on the below?
Micah, it's appreciated when making such type of requests to
X-Debbugs-Cc the maintainer in question.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:18:05PM -0500, Mi
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
As discussed on the debian-qa list[1], please remove the openmosix and
kernel-patch-openmosix packages from the archive.
The openmosix package has a serious FTBS (#232810) for 1 year and 159
days old as of this writing. The maintainer's response is,
"Unfor
5 matches
Mail list logo
