Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Err, the version number may be strange, but why is this a bug
> in fvwm? The package still performs OK, does it not?
>
The BTS is used to report all kinds of problems with
the package, not just pure functionality bugs.
I am running my own fvwm package
Package: fvwm
Version: 2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
Please excuse if I am wrong, but is there a typo in the
version number? It should be something like
2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
AFAIK. There is no 2.5.130 upstream yet.
Would it be possible to fix this?
Many thanx
Harri
signature.
2 matches
Mail list logo
