Moin Helge!
Helge Kreutzmann schrieb am Montag, den 08. August 2005:
> Hello Eduard,
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:26:23PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > OTOH I am biassed. In the meantime I completed my apt-cacher package
> > with the features and I that is what I recommend now instead of
> > apt-
Hello Eduard,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:26:23PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> OTOH I am biassed. In the meantime I completed my apt-cacher package
> with the features and I that is what I recommend now instead of
> apt-proxy. It is simplier by designer, does not provide all the
> corner-case featur
Moin Fabian!
Fabian Pietsch schrieb am Samstag, den 06. August 2005:
> As a workaround, I've tried to download the uncompressed Packages file
> manually through apt-proxy, but first only ended up with exceptions in
> the apt-proxy log and an apt-proxy that was unresponsive to that
> specific backe
Hi,
I've been having the same problems, also with the sarge version of
apt-proxy. The problem really seems to arise from compressed Packages
files.
The source[1] suggests that Release and Packages files have to be
"registered" by apt-proxy for some reason; when running apt-get update
through apt-
4 matches
Mail list logo
