Bug#318098: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-08-31 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Sat, 27 Aug 2005] Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: > Still there are programs that depend on jackd (like rosegarden), so > it's importnad to make this package installable again. Rosegarden will be transitioned. Robert. -- "... being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house in

Bug#318098: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-08-26 Thread Panayotis Katsaloulis
Still there are programs that depend on jackd (like rosegarden), so it's importnad to make this package installable again. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318098:

2005-07-18 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Sun, 17 Jul 2005] Malcolm Smith wrote: > I believe this is because libjack0.100 conflicts with libjack0.80. > This should not be the case -- why give them different names if they > could not be installed simultaneously? libjack0.100.0-0 does not conflict with libjack0.80.0-0. If you unins

Bug#318098:

2005-07-17 Thread Malcolm Smith
I believe this is because libjack0.100 conflicts with libjack0.80. This should not be the case -- why give them different names if they could not be installed simultaneously?

Bug#318098: Unable to install jackd without having it remove many packages

2005-07-13 Thread drag sidious
Package: jack Version: 0.100.0-2 Originally I had jackd installed and during a upgrade it became nessicary to remove it to allow many packages to be installed. This may of been a bad move. I figured it was temporary and would of probably been fixed by now (like there was a package waiting to be