On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 09:45:40PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:40:25AM -0400, Sean Finney wrote:
> > Subject: d-e-p: cmdline flag to automatically append new patch name to
> > 00list
>
> Sounds like a valid issue, but I find it kind of dangerous. However, a
> patch will b
hi guys,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:35:04AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sounds like a valid issue, but I find it kind of dangerous. However, a
> > patch will be considered.
>
> To mitigate risks and facilitate users,
> adding a a commented-out line would be the least abruptive.
wouldn't ma
> > Subject: d-e-p: cmdline flag to automatically append new patch name to
> > 00list
>
> Sounds like a valid issue, but I find it kind of dangerous. However, a
> patch will be considered.
>
To mitigate risks and facilitate users,
adding a a commented-out line would be the least abruptive.
re
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:40:25AM -0400, Sean Finney wrote:
> Subject: d-e-p: cmdline flag to automatically append new patch name to 00list
Sounds like a valid issue, but I find it kind of dangerous. However, a
patch will be considered.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
Package: dpatch
Version: 2.0.10
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
subject says it all...
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LAN
5 matches
Mail list logo
