also sprach Alexander Gattin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.18.0037 +0200]:
> Why so? I see different behaviour (/dev/pts/3).
> Maybe you mean the difference between login and su?
[ssh into the box; login shell /bin/bash]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep -i '00(07|22)' /etc/profile ~/.bash_profile
/etc/l
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:09:07AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.17.0751 +0200]:
> > This comes from a discussion in debian-devel. In that discussion, the
> > existence of the pam_umask module was also mentioned.
>
> Even without pa
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:18:13AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Since any login session these days will invoke a shell,
Not true.
> there is no point in having login.defs set the umask
> -- the shell will override it anyway.
Not true again: tcsh, zsh
> Thus, so that people do not have t
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.17.0751 +0200]:
> This comes from a discussion in debian-devel. In that discussion, the
> existence of the pam_umask module was also mentioned.
>
> Hence, I suggest that, when commenting the UMASK setting in the default
> login.defs file,
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: login
> Version: 1:4.0.3-31sarge5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Since any login session these days will invoke a shell, there is no
> point in having login.defs set the umask -- the shell will override
> it anyway. Thus, so that people do not have
5 matches
Mail list logo
