Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-05-09 Thread Simon Walter
package mailscanner tags 313145 confirmed thanks will be relevant again if mailscanner makes it into the next stable release -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Alexander Wirt
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) schrieb am Tuesday, den 17. February 2009: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: > >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph : > > > >>> For me, this looks

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph : > >>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > >> Good point. What is the process to make th

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: > 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph : > > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . > Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is th

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread simon . walter
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: >> > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? >> I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it >> didn't made it into the last stable release? >> "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... >> C

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread George B.
2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph : > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> No, sorry. No new packages. Makes sense. > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? Thanks, Georg

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > > didn't made it into the last stable

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it > didn't made it into the last stable release? > "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this... > Can some

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-16 Thread Simon Walter
Hello "George B." writes: > The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release > (Lenny). :-( Mailscanner was removed from stable because of #506353[1]. > Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-16 Thread George B.
Hello, The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release (Lenny). :-( Any chance a volatile package can be made available? Thanks, George. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...