package mailscanner
tags 313145 confirmed
thanks
will be relevant again if mailscanner makes it into the next stable
release
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) schrieb am Tuesday, den 17. February 2009:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote:
> >> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph :
> >
> >>> For me, this looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote:
>> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph :
>
>>> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ .
>
>> Good point. What is the process to make th
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph :
> > For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ .
> Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug?
They haven't started lenny-backports yet. The structure is th
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote:
>> > Any chance a volatile package can be made available?
>> I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it
>> didn't made it into the last stable release?
>> "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this...
>> C
2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph :
> On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> No, sorry. No new packages.
Makes sense.
> For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ .
Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug?
Thanks,
Georg
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote:
> > > Any chance a volatile package can be made available?
> > I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it
> > didn't made it into the last stable
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote:
> > Any chance a volatile package can be made available?
> I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it
> didn't made it into the last stable release?
> "Acceptance rules" says nothing against this...
> Can some
Hello
"George B." writes:
> The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release
> (Lenny). :-(
Mailscanner was removed from stable because of #506353[1].
> Any chance a volatile package can be made available?
I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile
Hello,
The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release
(Lenny). :-(
Any chance a volatile package can be made available?
Thanks,
George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
10 matches
Mail list logo