Bug#312598: logcheck

2005-06-09 Thread Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
tags 312598 pending thanks On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:35 +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote: > While translating the file logcheck, I encountered the following > typo, which I thought you might like to eliminate in a future release. > From version 1.1.1-8, logcheck supports run-parts controled rule >

Bug#312598: logcheck

2005-06-08 Thread Clytie Siddall
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.40 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch While translating the file logcheck, I encountered the following typo, which I thought you might like to eliminate in a future release. _ 1. .po:10 auto: ⑤Type: note auto: ⑤Description re