On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > The rest of the preinst seems to be for a pre-sarge version too
> > (and is there since 1:4.2.0a-2), so maybe we can just get rid
> > that whole part of the preinst?
>
> So it seems. In fact, there is quite
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> The rest of the preinst seems to be for a pre-sarge version too
> (and is there since 1:4.2.0a-2), so maybe we can just get rid
> that whole part of the preinst?
So it seems. In fact, there is quite a bunch of stuff that can probably
be removed on similar grounds:
ntpdate.p
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> I think we only want to cover case 3, because case 2 is that the old
> package is removed but not purged, so there should be no binaries left
> to kill anyway.
>
> But actually, the checked version 1:4.2.0a-10 is older than t
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It's still doing that in 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2.
>
> I think we want an && instead of an || in the ntp-server.preinst?
>
> preinst can be called in the following ways:
> * `install'
> * `install'
> * `upgrade'
> * `abort-upgrade'
>
> And we o
found 312331 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2
thanks
It's still doing that in 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2.
I think we want an && instead of an || in the ntp-server.preinst?
preinst can be called in the following ways:
* `install'
* `install'
* `upgrade'
* `abort-upgrade'
And w
Hi,
what is the status of this bug? I think the suggested fix using
lt-nl is very easy and fixes the bug.
If you don't have time to upload a new version I can prepare a
NMU.
Regards,
Bastian
--
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `'gpg
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8
Severity: serious
ObJustification: installation of ntp-server into a clean/buildd chroot
kills ntpd in base
25 # There's also the problem of spurious ntpd server
processes,
26 # caused by the
7 matches
Mail list logo
