Bug#312129: unixodbc-dev: header files should be better in /usr/include/odbc/

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:14:37PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 19:32:59 -0700: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote: > > > Is it possible to put the header files in /usr/include/odbc/ ? > > > So there will be no filename confli

Bug#312129: unixodbc-dev: header files should be better in /usr/include/odbc/

2005-06-06 Thread Markus Kolb
Steve Langasek wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 19:32:59 -0700: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote: > > Is it possible to put the header files in /usr/include/odbc/ ? > > So there will be no filename conflicts with other packages because of > > the simple headerfilenames. >

Bug#312129: unixodbc-dev: header files should be better in /usr/include/odbc/

2005-06-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote: > Is it possible to put the header files in /usr/include/odbc/ ? > So there will be no filename conflicts with other packages because of > the simple headerfilenames. Why? What conflicts with unixodbc-dev in practice? Even libiodbc2-de

Bug#312129: unixodbc-dev: header files should be better in /usr/include/odbc/

2005-06-05 Thread Markus Kolb
Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 2.2.4-11 Severity: normal Is it possible to put the header files in /usr/include/odbc/ ? So there will be no filename conflicts with other packages because of the simple headerfilenames. Including the headers with e.g. is more significant, too. -- System Informat