Bug#311880:

2005-06-03 Thread t takahashi
On 6/3/05, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you have your reply-to's set to invalid addresses, as for what files: do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED] if so, they are valid and get to me. gmail ignores the + and everything after it. they are useful for filtering. if bts ever leaks to spammers

Bug#311881: Bug#311880:

2005-06-03 Thread Nigel Jones
tags 311881 + patch thanks control you have your reply-to's set to invalid addresses, as for what files: drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-03 22:38:17 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-03 22:38:15 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-03 22:38:15 ./usr/sbin/ -rwxr-xr-x root/r

Bug#311880:

2005-06-03 Thread t takahashi
i got your "i'm splitting" message, but not the split bugs. why? and why am i not being cc'ed on updates to the bugs? my own bts cluelessness, no doubt. just didn't find docs and thought i had set reportbug to do that. thanks.

Bug#311880:

2005-06-03 Thread t takahashi
see bug 311868. "warning: this package will activate a firewall upon installation." i still do not know what ipkungfu did to my system. did it install anything that was not purged?

Bug#311880: ipkungfu: Possible Description Misunderstanding

2005-06-03 Thread Nigel Jones
I'm going to need more information on this sorry, i've consulted a couple of Debian Developers and they have stated that the Description seems ok, with reference to other firewalls (shorewall for example which just states that it is an iptables firewall and then lists it's features). However, I am