On 2005-05-26 00:13:45 +0300 Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your bug report is rather vague.
Maybe it is, as the existence of contrib and non-free sections.
With which part of this policy does pptview not agree?
I meant the footnote to 2.2.3:
It is possible that there are policy
2.2.3 The non-free section
Packages must be placed in non-free or non-US/non-free if they are not
compliant with the DFSG or are encumbered by patents or other legal
issues that make their distribution problematic.
In addition, the packages in non-free and non-US/non-free
* must not be so buggy
Package: pptview
Version: 8.0-2
Severity: important
The presence of this package in Debian violates the policy, namely
Section 2.2.3[1]. There should be a decision made to include this
package in the pool (on a case-by-case basis), but I couldn't find out
any discussion on -legal or elsewhere.
I
3 matches
Mail list logo
