Cool. Can a D.D. set the appropriate tags on the bug?
Thanks,
Astronut
On 5/31/05, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 May 2005 04:35, astronut wrote:
> > Now to figure out how to get it to automaticall resolve this without
> > manual user intervention.
>
> See this [1] message
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 04:35, astronut wrote:
> Now to figure out how to get it to automaticall resolve this without
> manual user intervention.
See this [1] message for a proposed text in the release notes to deal with
this issue.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/2005/05/msg00310.html
Now to figure out how to get it to automaticall resolve this without
manual user intervention.
On 5/30/05, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, astronut said:
> > OK, her'es the log. We're down to 40 packages removed, and I can
> > believe that as being proper for
This one time, at band camp, astronut said:
> OK, her'es the log. We're down to 40 packages removed, and I can
> believe that as being proper for woody -> sarge, but I'm not the
> proper one to judge that.
[ snip ]
> The following packages will be automatically REMOVED:
> autoconf2.13 libdigest
OK, her'es the log. We're down to 40 packages removed, and I can
believe that as being proper for woody -> sarge, but I'm not the
proper one to judge that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ head -n 20 screenlog.1
debian-test:~# perl -pi -e 's/stable/sarge/' /etc/apt/sources.list
debian-test:~# aptitude inst
Ok, as both of you suggested, I tried this. It is much more
successful. First pass installs like 50 packages, drops 5.
The upgrade only removes 35 packages. Unfortunately I forgot to log,
and it scrolled past and pageup is using the wrong buffer. I will redo
to get a log of this transaction.
Yes, it's the same list as higher in the bug report thread. I am just
hitting "revert" on vmware.
On 5/30/05, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it the same list of packages? If not, send in the new lists. (I
> prefer the output of ' dpkg-query -W
> --showformat="${Package},${Version
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 00:51, astronut wrote:
> I attempted this on the full system (vmware), as opposed to the
> smaller test case and had 126 packages slated for removal. Complete
> log of session below. As before, it's a vmware box, and I have
> multiple copies so one click reverts it back and f
Is it the same list of packages? If not, send in the new lists. (I
prefer the output of ' dpkg-query -W
--showformat="${Package},${Version}" ').
Andrew
On 5/31/05, astronut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/28/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, this works:
> >
> > aptitude
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:51:00PM -0400, astronut wrote:
> On 5/28/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, this works:
> >
> > aptitude markauto libqt3
> > perl -pi -e's/stable/sarge/' /etc/apt/sources.list
> > apt-get update
> > aptitude dist-upgrade
>
>
> Except it doesn't.
On 5/28/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, this works:
>
> aptitude markauto libqt3
> perl -pi -e's/stable/sarge/' /etc/apt/sources.list
> apt-get update
> aptitude dist-upgrade
Except it doesn't.
I attempted this on the full system (vmware), as opposed to the
smaller test c
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
> After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
> but
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
but also the following:
1) debootstrap woody
2) Install the following pac
13 matches
Mail list logo
