Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-06-01 Thread Julien BLACHE
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Aurélien, >> And wrt performances, ;) > My tests show me an improvement of 7% with some USB 1.1 devices and 19% > for some USB 2.0 devices. I don't found that insignificant. It's an interesting improvement for sure, but we're too close to a release t

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 05:24:50PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would prefer I change in SANE instead of libusb, so that other > > > applications using libusb won't suffer to perf

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would prefer I change in SANE instead of libusb, so that other > > applications using libusb won't suffer to performance losses. > > I strongly disagree. I know what I'm losing with

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-24 Thread Julien BLACHE
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would prefer I change in SANE instead of libusb, so that other > applications using libusb won't suffer to performance losses. I strongly disagree. I know what I'm losing with libsane as it is today, I don't know what I'm going to lose with this hacki

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi ! Julien BLACHE a écrit : Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Frederic, The problem lies in libusb, it increased its block size from 4k to 16k libusb strikes again \o/ Actually I am still convinced the problem is not in libusb. This size is only the block size used to dial

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-23 Thread Julien BLACHE
Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Frederic, > The problem lies in libusb, it increased its block size from 4k to 16k libusb strikes again \o/ > to improve performance of USB 2 in 0.1.10 and this broke libgphoto2[1], > so I got to learn about that stuff and tilted when Jerome told me

Bug#310365: libusb timeout, patch

2005-05-23 Thread Frederic Peters
Hi Julien, The problem lies in libusb, it increased its block size from 4k to 16k to improve performance of USB 2 in 0.1.10 and this broke libgphoto2[1], so I got to learn about that stuff and tilted when Jerome told me about his problem. Also, I talked with Aurelien Jarno before I had a patch fo