Bug#310327: patch

2005-09-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >Upon investigation of this problem I noticed that ssmtp (oldstable > >and stable) always strips the last line of the input before sending. > > > >gluck!joey(pts/4):~> seq 1 10|sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >--> 1..9 > > > >gluck!joey(pts/4):~> echo seq 1 10|send

Bug#310327: patch

2005-09-09 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:47:29AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > >Upon investigation of this problem I noticed that ssmtp (oldstable >and stable) always strips the last line of the input before sending. > >gluck!joey(pts/4):~> seq 1 10|sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--> 1..9 > >gluck!joey(pts/4):~>

Bug#310327: patch fixing the stdin-no-headers scenario

2005-09-04 Thread Wouter Van Hemel
This quick patch should fix the problem of ssmtp eating lines when there are no headers supplied on stdin, as Martin Schulze remarked before. Ssmtp expects to receive 'headers - empty line - body', and when only the body is included, it tries to put all lines in the header and creatively eat

Bug#310327: patch

2005-08-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Aidas Kasparas wrote: > Please find bellow a patch which check EOF condition instead of no > input. Without fix for this bug package is virtually not useable (I > experienced mysterious attachment cuts, so I can not relay on it at it's > present form :-( Please consider importance of this bug as "s

Bug#310327: patch

2005-08-25 Thread Aidas Kasparas
Please find bellow a patch which check EOF condition instead of no input. Without fix for this bug package is virtually not useable (I experienced mysterious attachment cuts, so I can not relay on it at it's present form :-( Please consider importance of this bug as "serious" at the very least. --