Hi Peter,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Peter Gervai wrote:
> I was pondering this for the last week.
> First, there were no real security bugs fixed, but many small ones (like
> the DoS with frames).
> Second, there were lots of small annoying ones fixed (like endless refresh on
> s
Hello Steve,
On Sat, 21 May 2005 03:10:19 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug
> #300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached
> testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new u
Hi Peter,
Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug
#300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached
testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new uploads since the middle
of last month. Is 0.10.4-6 suitable for release in your opinio
Package: elinks
Severity: serious
The elinks package contains nonfree code in the file
src/protocol/ftp/ftpparse.c . The license for the file requires that
commercial use be reported to the author. This is the same issue that
affects the now removed prozilla download accelerator. I am contacting
t
4 matches
Mail list logo