Bug#309901: RE: Bug#309901: upload 2.6.x to unstable

2005-05-23 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi Bradley, thank you for the hint about libatk. I completely forgot about that in my mind. I'll wait for Sarge being released and then ask the GNOME maintainers about their thoughts regarding this library. However please remember to use "Reply To All" in your mailer or to Cc: [EMAIL PROT

Bug#309901: upload 2.6.x to unstable

2005-05-20 Thread Bradley Bell
Gtkmm 2.6.x requires libatk 1.9.x/1.10.x, which is only in experimental at this time. -Brad > -Original Message- > From: Philipp Kern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:46 AM > To: Debian Bug Tracking System > Subject: Bug#309901: upload 2.

Bug#309901: upload 2.6.x to unstable

2005-05-20 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: gtkmm2.4 Severity: wishlist Gtkmm 2.6.x should be uploaded to unstable. If it doesn't maintain binary compatibility it should go in with an increased SONAME. Otherwise I cannot see what Gtkmm 2.6 holds off from entering unstable as it is backwards-compatible to 2.4, apart from the coming