Bug#309665: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#309665: dropbear: Please offer choice of inetd installation (debconf question))

2005-05-24 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:05:30PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > | > In low end systems running dropbear as a standalone service consumes > | > memory. However dropbear supports running the service from inetd.conf so > | > please offer installation choices like: > | I don't want that. (1) I don't lik

Bug#309665: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#309665: dropbear: Please offer choice of inetd installation (debconf question))

2005-05-23 Thread Jari Aalto
| > In low end systems running dropbear as a standalone service consumes | > memory. However dropbear supports running the service from inetd.conf so | > please offer installation choices like: | > | > 1) Run as service (at boot) | > 2) Run from inetd (uses less memory) | > | > The line to ad

Bug#309665: dropbear: Please offer choice of inetd installation (debconf question)

2005-05-18 Thread Jari Aalto
Package: dropbear Version: 0.45-2 Severity: wishlist In low end systems running dropbear as a standalone service consumes memory. However dropbear supports running the service from inetd.conf so please offer installation choices like: 1) Run as service (at boot) 2) Run from inetd (uses less m