Bug#309499: postgrey won't start with -T switch on perl

also sprach Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.17.1928 +0200]: > I'm sorry, Martin, but postgrey _does_ use the -T switch, so this > _is_ any important bug. The existing postgrey "binary" uses the > following shebang line: > #!/usr/bin/perl -T -w Uh oh, I completely misunderstood your repor

Bug#309499: postgrey won't start with -T switch on perl

package postgrey retitle 309499 perl -T prohibits start when setting --dbdir severity important thanks >> On my system, postgrey won't start when it has the -T switch to >> perl in its shebang line. This is what I get when reproducing it >> manually: > > This is not a bug in the existing package

Bug#309499: postgrey won't start with -T switch on perl

severity 309499 wishlist thanks > On my system, postgrey won't start when it has the -T switch to > perl in its shebang line. This is what I get when reproducing it > manually: This is not a bug in the existing package but your desire for postgrey to use taint checks. I agree that it should. Neve

Bug#309499: postgrey won't start with -T switch on perl

Package: postgrey Tags: patch Thanks Hi. Here is a patch for the named problem (dbdir is tainted, so it has to be untainted (and checked) before being used in potentially harmful operations (like open ">>$dbdir"). cu, sven PS: I will offer you two more patches (wishlist) which allow easier sett

Bug#309499: postgrey won't start with -T switch on perl

Package: postgrey Version: 1.21-1 Severity: important On my system, postgrey won't start when it has the -T switch to perl in its shebang line. This is what I get when reproducing it manually: = cut here = mail1:/data/shared/www# /usr/sbin/postgrey --p