Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 19, Alexander Verbovetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"call no-auth" is meaningless, unless you have an /etc/ppp/peers/no-auth > >file. Do you? > Yes, I have. Now I simply put `noauth' into /etc/ppp/peers/provider instead > of > `call no-auth'. > > It seems, using the call option breaks

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
"call no-auth" is meaningless, unless you have an /etc/ppp/peers/no-auth file. Do you? Yes, I have. Now I simply put `noauth' into /etc/ppp/peers/provider instead of `call no-auth'. It seems, using the call option breaks the initialization of the tdb database. Regards, Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 18, Alexander Verbovetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, the segfault vanishes with `call no-auth' removed. "call no-auth" is meaningless, unless you have an /etc/ppp/peers/no-auth file. Do you? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
On Sun, 13 May 2005, Tomas Jura wrote: So may be this bug is related to nested config file call. Indeed, the segfault vanishes with `call no-auth' removed. Moreover, with 2.4.2+20040428-6 version the pon command produced a message tdb_store failed: Invalid tdb context (but worked fine nevertheless)

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
Please attach /etc/ppp/peers/provider user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" plugin rp-pppoe.so eth0 noipdefault defaultroute persist noaccomp default-asyncmap nopcomp noccp novj (I suppose that you did not modify /etc/ppp/options). diff options.dpkg options 35c35,36 < auth --- #auth call no-auth 340a342,348 #

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 08, Alexander Verbovetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #0 0x08074fd2 in tdb_store (tdb=0x0, key={dptr = 0x8090f20 "", dsize = 0}, It crashes because the TDB database has not been initialised, but I do not know why. Please attach /etc/ppp/peers/provider (I suppose that you did not modify /

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
What happens if you delete /var/run/ppp*.tdb? Segfaults. If it still segfaults, please get a new stack trace from an unstripped binary (http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/pppd.unstripped.gz). Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/pppd call provider'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Rea

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On May 08, Alexander Verbovetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #0 0x08074fd2 in tdb_store () What happens if you delete /var/run/ppp*.tdb? If it still segfaults, please get a new stack trace from an unstripped binary (http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/pppd.unstripped.gz). -- ciao, Marco signature.

Bug#308136: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault)

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
Are you getting a kernel oops too? I think no. If not, please get a stack trace from pppd ("gdb pppd" "run call provider"). I'm not sure, I generated core by "pppd call provider" and then gdb /usr/sbin/pppd core (gdb) bt #0 0x08074fd2 in tdb_store () #1 0x08051b80 in unlock_db () #2 0x08061a11 i

Bug#308136: pon: segmentation fault

2005-05-07 Thread Alexander Verbovetsky
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20050321+2 Severity: important With kernel-mode pppoe, the `pon' command exits with the "Segmentation fault" message. Kernel 2.4.27 patched with kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27 (2.4.27-9) kernel-patch-2.4-lowlatency (20041204) kernel-patch-2.4-preempt (20040321-3) Version 2.4