Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed

2006-03-02 Thread Jesus Climent
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Jesus, you write to Sebastien: > In a previous conversation with me you pointed out that there are > others downloaders that a user can decide to select, but failing to > depend on at least one of the ones provided as a package

Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed

2006-03-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Sebastien, On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 00:24 +0100, Sebastien J. Gross wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the > > maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who > >

Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed

2006-03-01 Thread Sebastien J. Gross
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the > maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who > are interested in helping maintain this package. Sorry for the late answer but I lack

Bug#307833: Processed: Re: apt-file: broken. curl is needed

2006-02-28 Thread Ian Jackson
I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who are interested in helping maintain this package. Would any of the keen people we see involved in this bug report consider contesting the maintainership of the