Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-06 Thread Arthur Korn
tags 307226 = confirmed help thanks Hi Since I'm clueless on the finer points of C++/gcc/amd64-pure I won't be able to do much to track this issue down. Your help would be much appreciated. Regards, 2ri -- Secure email, spread GPG, clearsign all mail. http://www.gnupg.org . Vielleicht ist alles

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-06 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Friday 06 May 2005 16:37, James Curbo wrote: > I can reproduce it. This is with your .todo file: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ todo + > - 1.Get kwartz-mkmethod working > - 2.Update manpages > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tdr 2 > Segmentation fault > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tdr 1 > Segmentation fault > [EMAIL P

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-06 Thread James Curbo
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:01 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > Hi amd64 folks, > > Could anyone that uses or is interested in devtodo on amd64 see if they can > reproduce the problem described in this bug? > > Basically with certain .todo files (there is one attached on the bug with > reproduc

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-06 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
Hi amd64 folks, Could anyone that uses or is interested in devtodo on amd64 see if they can reproduce the problem described in this bug? Basically with certain .todo files (there is one attached on the bug with reproduction redetails), tdr will segfault. I'd like to see if this is reproducabl

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-06 Thread Arthur Korn
Wesley J. Landaker schrieb: > Did you try it under the "unstable" chroot, or under "sid_amd64_pure"? > Unstable on there is a 32-bit chroot, so wouldn't have this problem. Yes I tried in the unstable chroot. Sorry I'm completely incompetent on that matter. > I tried rebuilding, but still get the

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-05 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Thursday 05 May 2005 15:51, Arthur Korn wrote: > I cannot reproduce this on pergolesi.debian.org under current > unstable. The binary devtodo package from the archives was not > runnable there due to it's libc0.3 dependency (??), so I rebuilt > the package, which luckily worked (all build deps s

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-05 Thread Arthur Korn
tags 307226 + unreproducible thanks Hi I cannot reproduce this on pergolesi.debian.org under current unstable. The binary devtodo package from the archives was not runnable there due to it's libc0.3 dependency (??), so I rebuilt the package, which luckily worked (all build deps satisfied). Then I

Bug#307226: devtodo: tdr segfault on amd64

2005-05-01 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
Package: devtodo Version: 0.1.18-1 Severity: normal Sometimes I'll get a segfault when removing an entry with tdr. I believe I've seen this on other architectures, but I know it at least happens with amd64 (which isn't an official architecture yet). The .todo file I've had trouble with is (or wil