Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:12:25AM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> > Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > > I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file.
> > >
> > > This is incorrect -- there's no reason that, given the existance of the
> > > build depends on mips/mipsel
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:12:25AM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file.
> >
> > This is incorrect -- there's no reason that, given the existance of the
> > build depends on mips/mipsel, that this package couldn't build. The
Ryan Murray wrote:
> > I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file.
>
> This is incorrect -- there's no reason that, given the existance of the
> build depends on mips/mipsel, that this package couldn't build. The package
> should stay listed as arch: any. This way, once sbcl is availabl
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:15:58PM -0600, Kevin M. Rosenberg wrote:
> vcs-tree depends upon the sbcl package. sbcl no longer supports mips/mipsel.
>
> I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file.
This is incorrect -- there's no reason that, given the existance of the
build depends on mips
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
vcs-tree depends upon the sbcl package. sbcl no longer supports mips/mipsel.
I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file.
Please remove the mips/mipsel versions of vcs-tree from the ftp
archive so that new versions of vcs-tree can migrate to sarg
5 matches
Mail list logo
