Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-04 Thread Roel van der Made
Hi Lamont, On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:52:03PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > > Just to keep things clear, 2.2.3-1 keeps nagging about the same sdbm > > libs. Also it complaints, when installing, about not beiing allowd to > > renam

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-04 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > Just to keep things clear, 2.2.3-1 keeps nagging about the same sdbm > libs. Also it complaints, when installing, about not beiing allowd to > rename some bins in /usr/lib/postfix, when I remove them by hand the > install goes all

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-03 Thread Roel van der Made
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:48:45PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one > > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report > > before: > >

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-02 Thread Roel van der Made
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:48:45PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one > > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report > > before: > >

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-02 Thread Roel van der Made
Package: postfix Version: 2.1.5-9 Followup-For: Bug #305586 Hi, When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report before: May 2 22:48:00 gtv postfix/master[5541]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/tl

Bug#305586: postfix: Still got the same issues when using 2.2.2-3

2005-05-02 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote: > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report > before: Yeah... The fix only affects new installs. I'll have to go force things