Hi Lamont,
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:52:03PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote:
> > Just to keep things clear, 2.2.3-1 keeps nagging about the same sdbm
> > libs. Also it complaints, when installing, about not beiing allowd to
> > renam
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote:
> Just to keep things clear, 2.2.3-1 keeps nagging about the same sdbm
> libs. Also it complaints, when installing, about not beiing allowd to
> rename some bins in /usr/lib/postfix, when I remove them by hand the
> install goes all
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:48:45PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote:
> > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one
> > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report
> > before:
>
>
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:48:45PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote:
> > When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one
> > still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report
> > before:
>
>
Package: postfix
Version: 2.1.5-9
Followup-For: Bug #305586
Hi,
When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one
still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report
before:
May 2 22:48:00 gtv postfix/master[5541]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/tl
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:54:24PM +0200, Roel van der Made wrote:
> When trying 2.2.2-3 (yes, I already downgraded to 2.1.5-9 since that one
> still works) I still got the same problems as mentioned in the report
> before:
Yeah... The fix only affects new installs. I'll have to go force
things
6 matches
Mail list logo