Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 avril 2005 à 09:04 +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA a écrit :
> > Package: libgtop2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Please, try to not break API/ABI compatibility in future libgtop2
>
> Nothing to do with the distribution, that's an upstream decision. I've
> already
Le lundi 02 mai 2005 à 14:51 +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA a écrit :
> I disagree with you, Debian should enforce API compatibility even if
> upstream is so evil to not do so.
You are saying than the Debian package should not be API compatible with
the upstream code and the other distributions?
Cheers
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le lundi 02 mai 2005 à 14:51 +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA a écrit :
> > I disagree with you, Debian should enforce API compatibility even if
> > upstream is so evil to not do so.
>
> You are saying than the Debian package should not be API compatible with
> the upstream code an
Le lundi 02 mai 2005 à 15:39 +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA a écrit :
> I think other distributions also want an stable API so they'll use the
> Debian release instead upstream to be compatible (or Debian should use
> API stable release from other distributions if available).
>
> So, if upstream wants to
Package: libgtop2
Severity: wishlist
Please, try to not break API/ABI compatibility in future libgtop2
versions. It's a pain having a new library that conflicts with the old
one and needs to recompile all the packages that use libgtop2.
Just take gtk+2 as an example. They haven't broken API/ABI c
5 matches
Mail list logo
