Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
tags #305443 confirmed pending thanks On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:44:11AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > OK, that should be fine :) Tagging the bug appropriately. The fixes are in svn. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 19:36 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I am not a friend of holding a user's hands through the entire > configuration process, making reference to the documentation > completely unnecessary. I have, however, added an example: > > --- debian/README.Debian(revision 1132) > +

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:16:23AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > My only final suggestion is to include a trival example in README.Debian > (or commented out in /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/000_localmacros if you want > to create the sample file): > > e.g. to switch on a basic on/off definition, use

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 18:18 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I see. I always forget that there is client authentication as well. > That feature is never used by me. > Ah, that explains the confusion. > I have added ... > # You can set AUTH_CLIENT_ALLOW_NOTLS_PASSWORDS to allow unencrypted > # clear t

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:38:43PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > The problematic phrase is "setting the appropriate macro as mentioned > in the comments in the configuration file". That is to say, this phrase > is clear on its own, it tells me that I will find further instructions > in /etc/exi

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:47 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Can you check the current version of the file, > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-exim4/exim/trunk/debian/README.SMTP-AUTH?op=file&rev=0&sc=0, > and say whether the docs are ok now. If not, please say what should be > changed. > Thanks for loo

Bug#305443: Re: Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-05-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:01:50PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:10 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > Please add the required comments. > > > > Comments are never required. I'll think about giving more information. > > > > When I say "required", what I'm talking about are th

Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-04-20 Thread Drew Parsons
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:10 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Please add the required comments. > > Comments are never required. I'll think about giving more information. > When I say "required", what I'm talking about are the ones referred to in README.SMTP-AUTH. Thanks for considering the issue.

Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-04-20 Thread Marc Haber
severity #305443 minor thanks On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:29:52PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > Severity: important NACK, this is a documentation issue. > Does it need to be set in 30_exim4-config_examples or in > /etc/exim4/passwd.client? How is it set? I am not going to duplicate the entire ex

Bug#305443: smtp-auth documentation is incomplete

2005-04-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: exim4-config Version: 4.50-6 Severity: important You've changed the way /etc/exim4/conf.d/auth/30_exim4-config_examples handles the case of unencrypted client-side authentication. README.SMTP-AUTH says unencrypted passwords can be enabled "by setting the appropriate macro as mentioned i