Bug#305146: printing CJK

2005-05-23 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 02:34 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I have no trouble printing CJK using Xprint, it doesn't seem to be > > taking as long as 5 minutes. Is there any other reason why you assert > > "Xprint sucks"? > > > > What processor are you usi

Bug#305146: printing CJK

2005-05-23 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 02:34 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I have no trouble printing CJK using Xprint, it doesn't seem to be > > taking as long as 5 minutes. Is there any other reason why you assert > > "Xprint sucks"? > > > > What processor are you usi

Bug#305146: printing CJK

2005-05-22 Thread Eric Dorland
* Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have no trouble printing CJK using Xprint, it doesn't seem to be > taking as long as 5 minutes. Is there any other reason why you assert > "Xprint sucks"? > > What processor are you using? I'm running on Pentium-M 1.5GHZ. > > I assume you're using xp

Bug#305146: printing CJK

2005-05-17 Thread Drew Parsons
I have no trouble printing CJK using Xprint, it doesn't seem to be taking as long as 5 minutes. Is there any other reason why you assert "Xprint sucks"? What processor are you using? I'm running on Pentium-M 1.5GHZ. I assume you're using xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-10. It's not XFree86's Xprint by th