On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:19:47 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine...
Yes, it does work fine. I've installed and testet it.
Thanks.
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> The build dependency is fine. It's the binary depends that is
> missing.
Ouch! I didn't think of that one. I *did* remove all traces of libsasl7 and
friends from my system, so I knew the build would not be able to complete if
xfmail really needed ol
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 2) Any idea why ${shlibs:Depends} does not include libsaslX?
>
> Because the above check is wrong: the xfmail binary is *not* linked against
> libsasl.
Oh.
> $ objdump -p /tmp/xfmail/usr/bin/xfmail | grep NEEDED
> NEEDED libmail.so.0
> NEED
tags 304976 fixed
thanks
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:40:50AM +0200, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> The build dependency is fine. It's the binary depends that is
> missing.
> The NMU still links against libsasl:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ dpkg-deb -x xfmail_1.5.5-2.1_i386.d
reopen 304976
thanks
Hello Henrique,
hello Steve!
The build dependency is fine. It's the binary depends that is
missing.
The NMU still links against libsasl:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ dpkg-deb -x xfmail_1.5.5-2.1_i386.deb
nmu-binary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xfmail-sasl-stuff$ ldd nm
5 matches
Mail list logo
