> I'm confused what you're asking. If you compile your own, it should be
> the same process as the old way. The only difference is that you now
> need to keep the binary modules package in synch w/ the
> ndiswrapper-utils package.
The 'ndiswrapper-modules-1.1' dependency was satisfied once I com
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 02:16 +0200, Xavier Grandmougin wrote:
> > I'm not really clear what you're asking. If you're using debian's
> > 2.6.8, you can install the binary modules from the archive; if you're
> > using another kernel, you'll need to install ndiswrapper-source, compile
> > it (it will
> I'm not really clear what you're asking. If you're using debian's
> 2.6.8, you can install the binary modules from the archive; if you're
> using another kernel, you'll need to install ndiswrapper-source, compile
> it (it will create binary modules if you use module-assistant or
> kernel-package
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 01:12 +0200, Xavier Grandmougin wrote:
> Is this dependency really mandatory ?
Unfortunately, yes. At least, given the things that work and don't work
well w/ dpkg, it was the best solution I could come up w/.
>
> If I compile my own module with the package ndiswrapper-sou
Is this dependency really mandatory ?
If I compile my own module with the package ndiswrapper-source, I
don't need to install any binary module, right ? Do I have to create
my own package to satisfy the dependency ?
Maybe I'm wrong, please tell me, and thank you for your work.
5 matches
Mail list logo
