Bug#303661: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#303661: logcheck: Simple rule

2005-04-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Please take a look at the ntp-server rule, which according to your > reasoning is buggy. yes i know. it's on my todo, not at all high ranked although. the last time i sent a patch to the ntp maintainers, they managed to merge a broken egrep rule #283

Bug#303661: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#303661: logcheck: Simple rule

2005-04-19 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: peer .* now (in)?valid > > > > adapted from the ntp-server rule > > please take a look at > /usr/share/doc/logcheck-database/README.logcheck-database.gz Please take a look at the ntp-server rule, which according to your reasoning is b

Bug#303661: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#303661: logcheck: Simple rule

2005-04-17 Thread maximilian attems
> ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: peer .* now (in)?valid > > adapted from the ntp-server rule please take a look at /usr/share/doc/logcheck-database/README.logcheck-database.gz * aboves rule doesn't match the complete logline * gratious .* (should only be used for random remote supplied strings) if your read