On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:06:43AM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> -4/-6 options could be added to hostname later, but I think hostname
> should rely on the resolver configuration for its default behavior
> anyway, so this patch would be a good starting point in any case.
Alright, I've applied this
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:46:35PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 02:39:52AM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> > This new patch fixes this, and relies on the resolver configuration to
> > choose the address family used by gethostbyname, which is better imho,
> > and doesn't make
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 02:39:52AM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> This new patch fixes this, and relies on the resolver configuration to
> choose the address family used by gethostbyname, which is better imho,
> and doesn't make use of the gethostbyname2, which is a GNU extension.
Is this patch yo
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:30:26PM +0200, I wrote:
> Here is a patch which makes hostname try an IPv6 lookup in case the IPv4
> one fails. This is needed to make hostname work on IPv6-only hosts.
It seems defining 'option inet6' (which I just discovered) in
/etc/resolv.conf fixes part of the probl
Package: hostname
Version: 2.13
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
Here is a patch which makes hostname try an IPv6 lookup in case the IPv4
one fails. This is needed to make hostname work on IPv6-only hosts.
This is a quick minimal non-instrusive half-fix only. I'd like to
implement the followin
5 matches
Mail list logo
