Hi Alban,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:15:18AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for giving us a zeroconf implementation.
> I read the bug report about the (C) issue but found it less
> important than the "upstream" url pointing to a non existant
> page. I was willing to learn more about t
Thank you for giving us a zeroconf implementation.
I read the bug report about the (C) issue but found it less
important than the "upstream" url pointing to a non existant
page. I was willing to learn more about this zeroconf
implementation and was a bit at lost.
Should i read progsoc mailing list
2 matches
Mail list logo
