Bug#302658: workaround for failure to obtain lease

2005-07-28 Thread Russ Dill
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:27 +, Kacper Wysocki wrote: > On 06/07/05 08:51:14, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:06:46PM +, Kacper Wysocki wrote: > [snip] > > but instead of > > > > > -else > > > - /sbin/ifconfig $interface 0.0.0.0 > > > fi > > > +/sbin/ifconfig $int

Bug#302658: workaround for failure to obtain lease

2005-06-07 Thread Kacper Wysocki
On 06/07/05 08:51:14, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:06:46PM +, Kacper Wysocki wrote: [snip] but instead of > -else > - /sbin/ifconfig $interface 0.0.0.0 > fi > +/sbin/ifconfig $interface 0.0.0.0 I'd rather use -else - /sbin/ifconfig $interface 0.0.0.0 f

Bug#302658: workaround for failure to obtain lease

2005-06-07 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:06:46PM +, Kacper Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > I got bitten by this as well. My take on the problem is that if you > have the resolvconf package installed, the script > > /etc/udhcpc/default.deconfig > > (called upon invocation by udhcpc) instead of running ifconfig

Bug#302658: workaround for failure to obtain lease

2005-06-07 Thread Kacper Wysocki
Hi, I got bitten by this as well. My take on the problem is that if you have the resolvconf package installed, the script /etc/udhcpc/default.deconfig (called upon invocation by udhcpc) instead of running ifconfig runs resolvconf, which does not put the network device in the state required