Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the verification; could you confirm the other relevant
> amd64-specific paths for me, i.e. for the plugin locations for mozilla,
> firefox, and netscape?
There is no Netscape plugin for amd64, and I think the Mozilla plugin
does double duty f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
[...]
> No, I just mean that the path fed to update-alternatives contains no
> "jre" component -- it reads
>
> /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown/plugin/amd64/mozilla/
>
> (which doesn't exist) rather than
>
> /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you say the scripts skip the JRE directory, do you mean that
> make-jpkg is not including the jre directory when it extracts the
> Blackdown source file? That would come as a great surprise, since I am
> fairly sure that would break many things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
[...]
> Thanks. I'm sorry to say that it still doesn't quite DTRT for the
> JDK, though -- the plugin is in
> /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown/jre/plugin/amd64/mozilla/, but the scripts
> skip the "jre" directory.
[...]
Aaron,
When
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for not adding Blackdown the first time; things got pretty
> hurried.
Don't worry, I know the feeling... ;-/
> While Jeroen is on vacation, I am awaiting a sponsor to upload
> 0.23.1 to experimental. In the meantime, could you test out the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
[...]
> Aaron,
> OK, good. It will probably be Tuesday night, UTC -0500. I will be
> traveling for work.
[...]
Aaron/Harri,
Sorry for not adding Blackdown the first time; things got pretty
hurried. While Jeroen is on vac
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for catching that. Sorry for the oversight; I will get to
> work on that. Jeroen is actually on vacation, so I will look for one of
> our other folks to upload. Would you be able to provide me with testing
> if I get an upload into experime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
[...]
> For some reason, you only fixed the scripts for Sun JDKs; the
> Blackdown scripts, which are more relevant for those of us on AMD64,
> still hardcode i386. (As you may have noticed, the original submitter
> was also compla
Package: java-package
Version: 0.23
Followup-For: Bug #301806
reopen 301806
thanks
For some reason, you only fixed the scripts for Sun JDKs; the
Blackdown scripts, which are more relevant for those of us on AMD64,
still hardcode i386. (As you may have noticed, the original submitter
was also com
9 matches
Mail list logo
