On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I would consider using -a and -i directly on every dh_* call, depending
> > on the target.
>
> Tollef Fog Heen sent me this patch...
That should work, yes.
It seems ugly to me, but it's your package, not mine :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Quoting Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > By reading debian/rules, it seems that you are already aware of this,
> > > but the way you are trying to fix it does not work.
> >
> > Any help to solve this will be appreciated as I'm far (far far
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > By reading debian/rules, it seems that you are already aware of this,
> > but the way you are trying to fix it does not work.
>
> Any help to solve this will be appreciated as I'm far (far far far)
> from being a deep Makefile wizard.
>
> Most of
> By reading debian/rules, it seems that you are already aware of this,
> but the way you are trying to fix it does not work.
Any help to solve this will be appreciated as I'm far (far far far)
from being a deep Makefile wizard.
Most of the stuff in debian/rules comes from stolen ideas in other
Package: lifelines
Version: 3.0.44-1
Packages "lifelines-reports", "lifelines-doc-sv" and "lifelines-doc"
are Architecture: all, so they should be built in the binary-indep
target of debian/rules, and they should not be built in the
binary-arch target as it happens in the current version.
By read
5 matches
Mail list logo
